The Economic Value of Sportfishing Trips to Oklahoma Lakes

March 2017


Recreation and Sportfishing at Oklahoma Lakes
As Oklahoma’s agencies and policymakers try to balance competing water uses with prolonged drought conditions, it is increasingly important to learn about the value of water resources like lakes and rivers. For example, conflicts have arisen between Oklahoma City,  the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations and users of Lake Sardis, each of whom lay claim to the water in the lake (Layden, 2015). There is increasing municipal demand for the lake’s water, but the community around Lake Sardis views the lake as a tourism draw, bringing in people for fishing, boating, hiking and wildlife viewing.  Each year, millions of trips are taken to public waterbodies in Oklahoma for boating, swimming, fishing and other outdoor activities (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014). One way to understand the value that Oklahomans place on preserving lakes and rivers is to measure and analyze visitation numbers.
Recently, thousands of trips have been affected by declining water quality conditions and water withdrawals at several Oklahoma lakes. Low lake conditions can result in lost access due to boat ramp closures, and algal blooms can warrant no-bodily-contact warnings. These changes can discourage potential visitors and impose economic costs on current water users by forcing them to travel to other lakes or not traveling at all. Additionally, fewer and/or shorter trips can mean fewer tourism dollars spent in the lake’s vicinity, hurting the local economy.
One of the most popular forms of outdoor recreation in Oklahoma is sportfishing. According to a national report on outdoor recreation, Oklahomans spend more total days fishing than wildlife watching and hunting combined (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014). Anglers spend more than $800 million annually on fishing-related purchases, generating $77 million in state and local tax revenue and supporting more than 11,000 jobs (American Sportfishing Association, 2012). Changing water conditions at Oklahoma lakes can therefore have an especially large effect on anglers and the economy.
The rest of this Fact Sheet summarizes a recent study on the value of sportfishing trips in Oklahoma and the impact of lake conditions on anglers. To evaluate the economic benefits of recreational fishing at Oklahoma lakes, an economic demand analysis of sportfishing trips taken by state residents was conducted. This analysis related angler’s lake visitation patterns across the state to differences in lake conditions, including water quality. The study is part of an ongoing effort to advance our understanding of the recreational value of Oklahoma’s lakes.

 


Summary of Key Results
•        More than two-thirds of all sportfishing trips in Oklahoma are to public reservoirs, while another ten percent are to rivers.
•        On average, an angler fishes 31 days during one year.
•        The most popular lakes in Oklahoma for sportfishing are Eufaula, Texoma, Fort Gibson and Grand Lake.
•        On average, an angler spends about $50 per fishing trip.
•        The number and economic impact of sportfishing trips varies with the size and location of lakes. However, even a small lake may attract 10,000 visits per year and generate hundreds of thousands of dollars in spending by anglers.
•        The average sportfishing trip has an economic value of about $67. This is the amount an angler is willing to pay to visit their preferred lake for a given trip. The specific value is higher for overnight trips and lower for day trips.
•        Water quality impacts anglers. The number of sportfishing trips to lakes decrease as turbidity (a loss of clarity) and an increase in hypereutrophic conditions (an excess of nutrients such as phosphorus and nitrogen, associated with algal blooms and little available oxygen in the water).


Sportfishing Demand and Valuation Study
Objectives
Economists have developed several ways of analyzing the demand for recreational activities. One approach is to use economic demand models to analyze the frequency of trips taken to different recreation sites across a region. This approach is convenient because it can be used to estimate the economic value of recreational trips with a valuation technique known as the travel cost method. Since there often is a small fee or even no fee to fish at lakes, this valuation method uses the cost of travel as a proxy for the price of visiting a site.
The main objective of the study was to analyze the demand for and estimate the value of fishing trips to individual lakes in Oklahoma. The study was able to identify the lake attributes that determine the angler’s choice of Oklahoma fishing site. Unfortunately, fish catch rate information was not available in time for this study, but information was gathered about the water quality and shoreline setting of lakes.
Data
Data on fishing trips was provided by the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation (ODWC). In fall 2014, the ODWC conducted a survey of 3,000 randomly selected fishing license holders living in Oklahoma. The study did not examine non-resident anglers. About 780 surveys were returned, for a response rate of 26 percent. The survey asked about fishing participation in the past year, species preferences, gear preferences, opinions about ODWC regulations and information about the most recent fishing trip. Approximately 17 percent of respondents said they did not fish in the past year. Among those who did fish, most preferred to fish for catfish and black bass.
A list of 148 Oklahoma lakes based on the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) lake index and the location information provided by anglers about their most recent fishing trip was determined. Table 1 provides some trip statistics from the ODWC data. Rivers and ponds were grouped into two generic fishing options and added to the list of lakes, making a total of 150 fishing alternatives used in the demand analysis.
Lake data came from a variety of sources. Water quality measures were obtained from the OWRB. Trophic State Index (TSI) and turbidity to measure water quality were used. Water with a TSI below 40 is considered oligotrophic, with low biomass and nutrient levels; oligotrophic lakes are associated with few game fish. Water with a TSI more than 60 is considered hypereutrophic, with excessive nutrient levels. Such lakes may contain more fish, but they have an increased risk of algal blooms and fish kills. Turbidity is a measure of suspended particulates in the water. High levels of turbidity reduce photosynthesis of submerged vegetation and fish biomass. Turbidity is perceptible to the eye and can be aesthetically unpleasant. The demand analysis used the TSI measure, plus an indicator for lakes classified as hypereutrophic to measure the relationship between lake nutrient levels and biological productivity and lake visitation. The analysis used the turbidity measure for the relationship between cloudy water conditions and visitation. The analysis also measured the impact of shoreline length, number of boat ramps and nearby forest size on visitation.

Table 1. Selected trip characteristics of Oklahoma resident anglers.       
Trip characteristics All TripsSingle Day Trips Overnight Trips
MedianAverage MedianAverage MedianAverage
Destination (in percentages)
Lake/Reservoir-73-65-81
River-16-11-12
Pond-11-24-7
Spending (in dollars)
Transportation 305320255086
Lodging and food 106201450113
Fishing costs (bait, boat, etc.)10348202049
Days131135

Methods
The demand analysis was conducted as a site choice model (Haab and McConnell, 2003). For Oklahoma fishing trips, this model assessed the importance of different lake features on visitation, including water quality, using data on 1) the 150 fishing alternatives, including all major lakes in the state, and 2) the locations anglers reported visiting most recently for the purpose of fishing.
The demand analysis was combined with the travel cost method to calculate the economic value of a fishing trip at individual lakes (Haab and McConnell, 2003). This per-trip value is measured as the difference between the maximum amount an angler is willing to pay to visit and fish at a site and the actual travel costs. In other words, this is the amount an angler is willing to pay to prevent their preferred site from being closed for one trip. An estimate of the damages from a site closure or a dead fishery can be estimated by multiplying this value by the total number of affected (or “lost”) trips.
Results
The results of the demand analysis are summarized in Table 2.  Sportfishing trips are significantly impacted by several lake characteristics:
1.    Anglers are less likely to fish at lakes far from home.
2.    Increases in TSI at a lake are associated with more trips.
3.    Fewer trips are taken to lakes with high turbidity and classified as hypereutrophic.
4.    Shoreline length, the  amount of forest and the number of boat ramps all have a positive effect on visitation.
5.    The impact of the Close-to-Home agreements between the ODWC and several municipalities to offer improved fishing opportunities at metro lakes. The analysis found lakes in the close-to-home program attract more trips than without the program.

Table 2: Interpretation of the site choice model results. 
*A “–” and a “+” denote a reduction and increase in the number of sportfishing trips taken to a lake on average for all lakes.
Lake characteristic Impact on fishing trips*
Travel cost
Trophic state index+
Hypereutrophic
Turbidity
Shoreline length+
Surrounding forest+
Number of boat ramps+
Close to Home program+

 

Table 3 shows that a typical sportfishing trip at each lake has an economic value of about $60. This estimate can be used to calculate the economic damages when, for example, a lake’s fishery is lost due to a fish kill, by multiplying the fishing trip value by the reduction in trips to the affected lake. For convenience, we have posted conservative estimates of the number of annual sportfishing trips taken to each lake. These figures are based on the demand analysis and USFWS’s estimate of the annual statewide trips taken by Oklahoma resident anglers (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014). These visitation numbers do not include sportfishing trips taken by non-residents.

Table 3. Estimated sportfishing trip value and total 2014 visitation to individual lakes.     
Note: The sum of trips across all lakes, rivers and ponds equals total statewide annual trips (7,499,000), as estimated from a 2011 survey (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2014).
LakeAnnual tripsValue of a trip ($)LakeAnnual tripsValue of a trip ($)
Altus City125359.47John Wells201859.48
American HorseClosed in 2014Kaw9083859.85
Arbuckle4426759.65Kerr15625060.11
Arcadia6921859.75Keystone26027960.56
Ardmore City361659.48Kitchen1446959.53
Atoka3044259.59Konawa1904759.55
Bell Cow2366759.56Langston1005559.51
Birch3561759.61Lawtonka2469259.57
Bixhoma448759.49Liberty1062259.51
Bluestem1062159.51Lloyd Church238259.48
Boomer2490959.57Lone Chimney2135159.55
Broken Bow6453059.75Long Creek38059.47
Brushy Creek208559.48Longmire903659.51
Burtschi421959.49LugertNo fishing in 2014
Canton2315059.56Markham Ferry14143360.05
Carl Albert133559.47McAlester782359.5
Carl Blackwell5961259.71McGee Creek3846959.62
Carl Etling30259.46McMurtry2766659.58
Carlton64859.47Meeker304659.48
Carter154659.48Mountain191659.48
Cedar651359.5Murray3560659.61
Chandler723059.5Nanih Waiya76159.47
Chickasha1144359.52New Spiro365059.48
Claremore1968159.55Okemah1545359.53
Clayton105159.47Okmulgee2265359.56
Clear Creek1118059.51Oologah18213260.22
Cleveland886359.5Overholser1674859.54
Clinton459959.49Ozzie Cobb169159.48
Coalgate404159.49Pauls Valley572159.49
Comanche383559.48Pawhuska158159.48
Copan3115759.59Pawnee678859.5
Crowder841359.5Perry809059.5
Crystal1002959.51Pine Creek4728559.66
Cumberland772559.5Ponca1640659.54
Cushing860759.5Prague732759.5
Dave Boyer79659.47Pretty Water259459.48
Dead Warrior66359.47Purcell605259.49
Dolese1747359.54Quanah Parker343859.48
Dripping Springs1719459.54Raymond Gary472759.49
Duncan568159.49Rocky995359.51
Durant271459.48Sahoma1690459.54
El Reno854559.5Sardis3872259.63
Elk City449759.49Schooler38459.47
Ellsworth5718759.7Scott King392759.49
Elmer129159.47Shawnee Twin3353459.6
Elmer Thomas555959.49Shell2543659.57
Eucha5149859.68Skiatook20551460.32
Eufaula52119661.77Sooner3454159.61
Evan Chambers78659.47Spavinaw3792259.62
Fairfax City363359.48Sportsman1348359.52
Fort Cobb3797059.62Stanley Draper4847559.66
Fort Gibson41470661.28Stroud2012459.55
Fort Supply643159.5Talawanda502259.49
Foss2849559.59Taylor827459.5
Frederick549259.49Tecumseh177559.48
Fuqua1873159.54Tenkiller10665759.9
Grand Lake38540161.24Texoma47803662.36
Great Salt Plains292559.48Thunderbird14815260.1
Greenleaf1814859.54Tom Steed2748559.58
Guthrie856259.5Vanderwork445059.49
Hall91359.47Veterans226859.48
Healdton214259.48Vincent125859.47
Hefner4052659.63Watonga350659.48
Henryetta362059.48Waurika2416659.57
Heyburn1842059.54Waxhoma454659.49
Holdenville1159659.52Wayne Wallace303159.48
Holway2139259.55Webbers Falls19271460.26
Hominy Municipal922759.51Weleetka221259.48
Hudson895359.51Wes Watkins2988959.59
Hugo3180959.6Wetumka509659.49
Hulah2311859.56Wewoka1030259.51
Humphreys2016559.55Wiley Post786059.5
Jap Beaver100859.47Wister6489459.75
Jean Neustadt644959.5Yahola672259.5
All ponds1342105All rivers923384

Conclusions
Sportfishing is an enduring pastime, but it also has important economic impacts on local economies. Maintaining a vibrant recreational fishery in Oklahoma and its associated economic benefits depends on protecting access to healthy lakes and rivers. This fact sheet summarized some of the work done on the economics of fishing in Oklahoma. Our analysis found that the value of a sportfishing trip to an individual lake is about $60. Furthermore, although fishing trips go to a wide variety of lakes in the state, the analysis found that angler visitation responds to differences in water quality. Lakes with high turbidity levels tend to receive fewer sportfishing trips. Lakes with low nutrient levels are also associated with fewer sportfishing trips, which suggest that anglers avoid lakes with less biomass (including fish biomass). On the other hand, lakes classified as hypereutrophic are associated with fewer sportfishing trips.
Managing Oklahoma’s water resources requires information about the value of different uses, including household and municipal consumption, agriculture, water-based recreation and wildlife protection. This study has quantified the value Oklahomans have for one type of recreation, angling, and thus serves as a lower bound or conservative estimate of non-marketed uses. If we had a more comprehensive dataset of all uses and all users, we would likely find even higher values for specific lakes. Protecting lakes and rivers can be costly, but it can directly benefit users, including recreational anglers, and have direct and indirect benefits for local economies. With the information in this fact sheet, decision makers and the public may find it easier to gauge the economic benefits of protecting Oklahoma’s lakes.

Literature Cited
American Sportfishing Association. Sportfishing in America: An Economic Force for Conservation. Report prepared by Southwick Associates. 2012.
Haab, Timothy C., and Kenneth E. McConnell. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-market Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002.
Layden, Logan, “The View from Sardis Lake: Why Moving Water to Where it’s Needed is So Hard.” State Impact, National Public Radio Broadcast. http://stateimpact.npr.org/oklahoma/2015/04/02/the-view-from-sardis-lake-why-moving-water-to-where-its-needed-is-so-hard/. April 2, 2015.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011 Oklahoma National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. Revised 2014.

 

Richard T. Melstrom
Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics

Deshamithra Jayasekera
Graduate Student, Department of Agricultural Economics

Corey Jager
Responsive Management Specialist
Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation

Tracy A. Boyer
Associate Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics

 

DASNR Extension Research CASNR
OCES  Contact
OCES
139 Agricultural Hall
Oklahoma State University
Stillwater, OK 74078
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY